OGONI PROFILE BY THE UNREPRESENTED NATIONS AND PEOPLES ORGANISATION (UNPO)
Date of Profile: 25 March 2008
According to the Unrepresented Nations and Peoples Organization, “The Unrepresented Nations and Peoples Organization (UNPO) is an international, nonviolent, and democratic membership organisation. Its members are indigenous peoples, minorities, and unrecognised or occupied territories who have joined together to protect and promote their human and cultural rights, to preserve their environments, and to find nonviolent solutions to conflicts which affect them.
Although the aspirations of UNPO Members differ greatly, they are all united by one shared condition – they are not adequately represented at major international fora, such as the United Nations. As a consequence, their opportunity to participate on the international stage is significantly limited, as is their ability to access and draw upon the support of the global bodies mandated to defend their rights, protect their environments, and mitigate the effects of conflict. . .”
Ogoni is one of the 43 Members of The Unrepresented Nations and Peoples Organization (UNPO):
- Chittagong Hill Tracts
- Crimean Tatars
- East Turkestan
- Gilgit Baltistan
- Hungarian Minority in Romania
- Inner Mongolia
- Iranian Kurdistan
- Iraqi Kurdistan
- Iraqi Turkmen
- Khmer Krom
- Rehoboth Basters
- South Moluccas
- Southern Azerbaijan
- Southern Cameroons
- West Balochistan
- West Papua
Date of Profile: 25 March 2008
Status: The Ogoni are a distinct ethnic nationality within the Federal Republic of Nigeria who have lived in the Niger Delta for more than 500 years.
Area: approx. 1,000 km²
Capital City: Bori
Language: : Ogoni languages –
Religion: Christianity, traditional beliefs
UNPO REPRESENTATION: Movement for the Survival of the Ogoni People
Ogoni is represented at the UNPO by Movement for the Survival of the Ogoni People (MOSOP). They were admitted to the UNPO as a member on 19 January 1993
In 1957 Shell Oil Company struck oil in Ogoniland, which set in motion a process that dramatically affected not only Ogoni society, but Nigeria as a whole.
Today, oil accounts for over 90% of Nigeria’s export earnings and some 80% of government revenue, controlling the entire Nigerian economy. The land of the Niger Delta is the source of over 90% of Nigeria’s oil.
For the Ogoni, who live in this region, the environmental and social costs of oil exploitation were painfully high.
The Movement for the Survival of the Ogoni People (MOSOP) was founded in 1990, as a mass-
The OBR opposes the revenue allocation formula under which the federal, state and local governments have almost complete power over the distribution of oil revenues. The Ogoni people feel they were not adequately compensated for the take-
The UNPO condemns any source of exploitation of natural resources that threatens the local environment and affronts their culture and livelihood. UNPO has been campaigning against the destruction caused by Shell in the area, including the development of canals, roads and pipelines that have infiltrated the streams and creeks of the Niger Delta.
The exploitation of the region’s hydrocarbon took place with little consultation of the Ogoni community. UNPO supports ILO Convention 169, which would give indigenous communities land rights and prevents political decisions without the consent of those living in these lands. Thus, UNPO has worked with MOSOP to bring awareness for the need for land rights to the Ogoni and other indigenous communities.
UNPO MEMBER PERSPECTIVE
The Movement for the Survival of the Ogoni People (MOSOP) was formed in 1990 as a mass-
MOSOP’s mandate is to strive by non-
Archaeological and linguistic evidence suggest the Ogoni have inhabited the Niger Delta for more than 500 years. They established an organized social system under which men and women of courage and ability enjoyed special status.
Although Ogoniland lay on the slave route from the hinterland to the coastal slave market, there is little evidence of Ogoni people being taken as a slave.
When other forms of trade were introduced into the region in the second half of the 19th century, weapons were purchased and wars became the order of the day. After the Berlin Treaty of 1885, Nigeria came under British colonial rule, but it was not until 1901 that British forces arrived in Ogoniland. The Ogoni people known for their fierce independence launched a strong resistance against this intrusion into their territory by the British forces, which lasted for more than a decade before they were finally subjugated in 1914 by the British forces. The British saw Nigeria in terms of three major ethnic groups: the Hausa-
HISTORY OF THE CONFLICT
Shell Oil company, began oil exploitation in the Niger Delta region of Nigeria in 1956 and there is a long history of their collaboration with the Nigerian government to quell popular opposition to its presence in the region. It became evident that for the Ogoni, who live in this region the environmental and social costs of oil exploitation would be painfully high.
Beginning December 1992, the people of Ogoni issued a thirty-
This singular non-
In the light of the forgoing developments, by the first quarter of 1993, Shell withdrew from Ogoniland, citing the hostile attitude of the Ogoni community to the company’s activities. Around April of the same year, Shell through its contractor went back under the protection of the Nigerian military to construct an oil pipeline. This was met with peaceful protests by Ogoni women whose farmlands were to be traversed by the pipelines leading to the destruction of their crops without any compensation. Rather than deal with the issues that had been raised by the women, the military that was hired by Shell opened gunfire on the protesting women.
Protests marches were organized all over Ogoniland in repudiation of the above incident and the military responded with highhandedness. This was to become the standard response of the government in the ensuing months. Several conflicts reportedly sponsored by the government occurred between July 1993 and April 1994 between Ogoni people and her neighbors all in the attempt to wear the Ogoni people down and box them into submission. Available evidence, including the sophisticated weaponry that was used by the adversaries of the Ogoni, indicate that governmental authorities were probably behind these supposedly “ethnic conflicts”.
Following the third of such conflict, in April 1994, a huge military operation was launched by the government, supposedly to restore order, but which in fact was aimed at destroying Ogoni lives and properties in the Afam area of Ogoni.
On May 21, 1994, four Ogoni leaders were murdered in Gokana Kingdom, reportedly by angry youths. Ken Saro-
In February 1995, after eight months of being detained without official charges, Ken Saro-
In March 1996, non-
By June, 1998, the maximum dictator, General Sani Abacha under whose watch thousands of Ogoni people perished eventually died in mysterious circumstances. This ushered in a new attempt at democratic engagement and electoral processes. The electoral process ushered in Chief Olusegun Obasanjo, himself a former prisoner on death row under the late maximum dictator as the new head of state. The Ogoni people had hoped that with his election, a new era marked by respect for human rights and commitment to the ideals of democracy and good governance would be entrenched in the polity. This was not to be as the earlier signs of a democratic posturing by the administration soon evaporated giving way to a civilian dictatorship which in its twilight was already planning to tamper with the constitution to elongate his tenure in office.
In the first months of 2001, MOSOP participated at the Oputa Human Rights Investigation Panel hearings in Port Harcourt, Nigeria. MOSOP called on the Nigerian military to accept responsibility for grave human rights violations by its officer corps against the Ogoni, committed between 1994 and 1998. Senior officers appearing for the Oputa Panel played down and even denied any involvement in the arbitrary shootings, rapes, assaults and detentions. These testimonies, thus, seem to be nothing less than a disgrace to the whole purpose of the Panel; to bring justice to the victims of these human rights violations.
Prosecutors claimed that Nigerian soldiers used deadly force at the request of Shell, and with Shell’s assistance and finance to undertake brutal raids against the Ogoni people throughout the early 1990s to repress a growing movement against the oil company. The Center for Constitutional Rights (CCR), Earth-
2. Lack of government investment and Corporate responsibility
Corruption in Nigeria has been described as the worst in Africa. According to Nigeria’s anti corruption agency, in 2003, an estimated 70% of oil revenues (more or less 14 billion dollars) were wasted or stolen.
Poverty has worsened in the Ogoni region during recent years. Besides the oil installations and refineries, there are no manufacturing industries in Ogoni to reduce unemployment. This situation increasingly results in psycho-
There is no concrete development plan by the government to address the huge infrastructural development gap in Ogoniland. Health facilities are not functioning optimally and school buildings are collapsing. Classrooms and laboratories remain poorly equipped. Attracting foreign aid to Ogoniland has been difficult and a couple of community self-
Under the context of corporate social responsibility, the companies have not established a comprehensive and fair compensation system. Shell is also alleged to fan embers of conflicts in the communities through employing divide-
With a new green façade for oil companies in the West, Shell plays the other side of the coin in Ogoniland. In 2000, Shell embarked on an assessment of its community development projects.However, out of the 480 assessed projects, only 23% were deemed successful. It was reported that the contracts were awarded to people who have close links to the company but has no reach within the community in need and most of the projects were not priorities of the communities.
3. Environmental Issues
The environmental costs of the oil exploration in Ogoni have been and are still very high. The agricultural and fishing communities experienced huge oil spills and pollution of drinking water, fishing grounds and farmlands. As there was no environmental impact study policy established before 1988 with the creation of the Federal Environmental Protection Agency (FEPA), the oil companies continued production without environmental liability.
In October 2006, the UNEP, United Nations Environment Programme, announced that in response to Ogoni demands, the Nigeria government has invited them to undertake a comprehensive environmental assessment of oil-
1. Do the Ogoni seek autonomy and control of the resources of their region?
The Bill of Rights presented to the Government and people of Nigeria called for political control of Ogoni affairs by Ogoni people. It states that the Ogoni people seek, “political autonomy to participate in the affairs of the Republic as a distinct and separate unit (by whatever name called), provided that this autonomy guarantees political control of Ogoni affairs by Ogoni people”. The bill calls for the right to control and use a fair proportion of Ogoni economic resources for Ogoni development; and the right to protect the Ogoni environment and ecology from further degradation.
2. Why were the “Wiwa Plaintiffs” able to prosecute Shell in the United States?
The United States established a legal framework in which to protect itself and its citizens abroad. As part of the First Judiciary Act of 1789, the architects of the U.S.legal system provided that aliens would be protected under international and common U.S. law under the Alien Tort Statute. This case in particular—Wiwa v. Royal Dutch Petroleum—is one of these few which has passed hearing after hearing from 2001 on to reach a U.S. Supreme Court appellate panel on 26 May 2009. With America obtaining nearly 10 percent per annum of its crude oil from Nigeria, bringing an ATS claim against the Nigeria operation of this multinational corporation is no small matter.
3. What impact does the trial and the rulings have on human rights law in the U.S. and abroad?
This case against Shell is a push towards the end of human rights abuses by corporate actors in the past decade or so. Such cases are putting serious corporate responsibility debates on the table through rulings that grant aiding and abetting violations significant weight. This is important in analyzing how corporations can be held accountable in actions committed as institutions regulated under state inducted standards, as well as being indirect participants in violation of international norms. Cases against multinational corporations will continue to have a broad affect on the way these companies do business in other countries. Organizations the world over are being brought to terms with their lax attention to human rights abuses in the areas they operate.
4. Did Shell release a statement after the settlement?
Shell released a statement on June 8th, 2009 stating that there was a settlement of $15.5 million for the family of the activists executed by the Nigerian government, “making a humanitarian gesture to set up a trust fund for benefit of the Ogoni people.”
Furthermore, the statement denies any Shell involvement in the executions. It states that,” Shell has always maintained the allegations were false. While we were prepared to go to court to clear our name, we believe the right way forward is to focus on the future for Ogoni people, which is important for peace and stability in the region.” However, this case brought negative publicity to the company and peace of mind to the relatives of the victims.
CULTURE AND ENVIRONMENT
Despite the introduction of Christianity, many aspects of the indigenous Ogoni culture and religion are still evident. The land on which they live and the rivers that surround them are traditionally very important to the Ogoni people. They not only provide enough food, they are also believed to be a god and are worshiped as such. This explains why the Ogoni people have so many difficulties with the degradation of the environment as a result of oil pollution.
Tradition’ in Ogoni means in the local tongue (‘doonu kuneke’), the honoring of the land The fruit of the land, especially yams, are honored in festivals. The annual festival of the Ogoni people is held during the period of the yam harvest. The planting season is not just a period of agricultural activity, but it is a spiritual, religious and social occasion. One of their cultural/spiritual “holidays” is held during the planting season as it is an occasion for them to honour the land, a sacred source of life for them. Another religious element of this link between the Ogoni people and nature is the belief that the soul of every human being has the ability to leave its human form and enter that of an animal, taking on the shape of that animal. These characteristics show that nature is very important for the Ogoni people.
Ogoniland consists of six kingdoms: Babbe, Eleme, Gokana, Ken-
In Ogoni land, large areas of fresh and salt water resources as fishing grounds have been rendered useless by oil spills. Food is becoming increasingly expensive and potential farmers are too poor to pay for seeds and labour. According to the National Geographic, in 1960 agricultural products such as palm oil constituted the majority of Nigeria’s export goods. Now, Nigeria imports more than it produces in agricultural products.
Before the discovery of oil in the Niger Delta Region and in Ogoniland in particular in 1957, the main source of subsistence was agriculture and fishing. Despite their low market prices, the marketing of Yam and cassava was a significant resource for the Ogoni. However, the importance of agricultural input in the economy has been severely reduced since oil was discovered in the region. In effect, the discovery of black gold, creating a source of potential consequent economic benefit for the country, led to loss of farmlands due to the land appropriation by oil companies. With the biggest share of the economy in oil investments, agriculture lost its prominence in the economic sector. Furthermore, the oil spills due to the intense oil production created soil fertility problem, further leading to a loss of lands.
LEDUM MITEE AS PRESIDENT OF THE UNREPRESENTED NATIONS AND PEOPLES ORGANIZATION (UNPO)
November 10, 2006
The UNPO GA Elects Ledum Mitee as President
The VIII General Assembly held in Taipei, Taiwan, from 27 until 29 October 2006, elected the new leadership of UNPO, filling the positions of President, Vice-President and Members of the Presidency. The GA also announced the names of four individuals appointed as Honorary Presidents.
At the VIII General Assembly held in Taipei, Taiwan, from 27 until 29 October 2006, UNPO adopted the first leg of its reform and modified its founding document, the UNPO Covenant, seeking to lay the structure for a revitalized organisation, strengthened and prepared for the challenges of the twenty-first century. Integral to the GA was also the election of the new leadership of UNPO, filling the positions of President, Vice-President and Members of the Presidency. The GA also announced the names of four individuals appointed as Honorary Presidents.
President and Vice-President
Mr. Ledum Mitee was elected President. He is a lawyer, leader of the Ogoni people in Nigeria and President of the Movement for the Survival of the Ogoni People (MOSOP). Mr. Mitee, a former prisoner of conscience, has worked tirelessly in the field of human rights, and was moreover notably the co-defendant of a prominent Ogoni leader whose brutal execution in 1995 prompted international outcry, namely Ken Saro-Wiva, former Vice-Chair of the UNPO General Assembly.
Ms. Maysing Yang was elected Vice-President. She currently holds the position of Vice Minister of the Overseas Compatriot Affairs Commission, Vice President of the Taiwan Foundation for Democracy and is the Director of the Taiwan-US Culture Exchange Center. Ms. Yang is also the founder of the council of Asian Liberal and Democrats and an active Member of Liberal International.
The General Assembly adopted by standing ovation the following as Honorary Presidents of the organisation:
Mr. Erkin Alptekin
Sen. John Nimrod
Dr. Parris H. Chang
Ms. Tsering Jampa
UNPO, since its inception in 1991, is indebted to the dedication and commitment of these individuals and expressed its sincere appreciation and respect for their devoted efforts into the organisation.
Members of the Presidency
UNPO acknowledged in appreciation the accomplishments of the Presidency which had served its terms since the VII General Assembly. The nine other seats of the Presidency were composed of the following:
Abkhazia (Mr. Maxim Gunjia)
Ahwazi (Dr. Karim Abdian)
East Turkestan (Mr. Dolkun Isa)
Khmer Krom (Mr. Thach Thach)
Maasai (Ms. Mary Simat)
Mapuche (Mr. Reinaldo Mariqueo)
Scania (Mr. Göran Hansson)
Tibet (Mr. Ngawang Choephel)
Zanzibar (Mr. Seif Sharif Hamad)
Serving as the General Secretary of UNPO is Mr. Marino Busdachin, elected at the VII General Assembly. He has been with UNPO since 2003.
The new leadership is to serve in the term until the IX General Assembly in 2008.
– See more at: http://www.unpo.org/article/5809#sthash.DnD6UZLy.dpuf